今天发兵静安感叹纵横轨道阡陌交错将我前后处所曲线相连，转悠了半天还是在一条线上纠缠。劳累了筋骨之后决定不能让脑细胞独乐，便开动脑筋神游太虚思路决定出路。焦点自然是放在不久的欧林之上，今天得到的重大利空消息是欧林前晚要被迫至一郊区老树林寻欢作乐一昼夜，唯恐殃及企盼多年的欧林盛事，甚为苦恼与烦心，眼下只能见机行事见招拆招了。
欲扬先抑，话说前几日沸扬的偷拍门，个人以为对安保（保密+安全）的警示作用极大，如果仅从违反新闻道德的角度观之，以网名情绪为切入点难免有转移视线避重就轻的嫌疑。坦白说我是看了片花的(英文叫trailer)，结果是看了还想看，欲罢不能，也就有了本文开头的一幕。有网友激愤之下说要考虑取消韩国台的采访资格，暂不说组委会或其他机构是否有执行的权限，连基本的依据似乎也无章可循，只能以违背新闻职业道德笼统之。其实所谓保密协议是与在场的工作或演职人员签订大多为国人，而从事后来看与媒体并无白纸黑字的书面约定更别说模棱两可的转播机构可在彩排时调试机器一说了，所以此事想必只能以电视台道歉，奥组委出面批判了结，韩国台还是架着摄像机在场外乱扫。回头观之官方宣称的保密措施如何细致周详，摄影摄像器材一律不得通关还是在事实的检验之下成色不足，给人外紧内松内外有别之感。须知韩国台可是在能变换拍摄角度或改用不同机位情况下从容拍摄的，若采默许一说如何解释我们上海的五星体育连鸟窝都没让进；若采偷拍一说那安保问题大了。好在事件已经平复，最广大人民欣赏欧林的兴致依然高涨。
另外一个大笑话我觉得不提一下愧为法政系的学生了，这是个在不断修正中的错误，当初的莽举无异于搬起石头然后怎么地。体育外事接待中的基本常识居然也会想到要去变更，搞这点小动作既不符传统又为人诟病，怕别人贴ZZ标签自己却授人以柄。有这点闲工夫还不如去统一下大小新闻发布会与会者名牌上姓名中文和拼音的上下顺序呢。明天接着写
8/04/2008
9/29/2007
7/01/2007
5/26/2007
NONPLUS
People should not be praised for their virtue if they lack the energy to be wicked; in such cases, goodness is merely the effect of indolence.
5/09/2007
Liverpool and Europe are made perfectly for each other!
By STEVEN HOWARD
May 02, 2007
Source: www.thesun.co.uk
As Rafa Benitez and Liverpool head for the Acropolis and other crumbling reminders of antiquity, Jose Mourinho’s Euro dream lies in ruins.
Any Champions League semi-final defeat is a killer but to lose in a penalty shootout is death by a thousand cuts.
So a Chelsea season that, in Benitez’s tongue-in-cheek words, offered “trophies, trophies, trophies” only Saturday morning is now in tatters.
Well, there’s still an inaugural and high-profile FA Cup final at the new Wembley but how much stomach for that will Chelsea have after the events of last night?
At the end — as Dirk Kuyt’s winning penalty went in — Anfield was a sea of red.
And in the middle, the blue-shirted men from Stamford Bridge began a sad, painful walk towards the dressing room. A sea of misery.
A Bridge of Sighs.
Well, there’s still an inaugural and high-profile FA Cup final at the new Wembley but how much stomach for that will Chelsea have after the events of last night?
At the end — as Dirk Kuyt’s winning penalty went in — Anfield was a sea of red.
And in the middle, the blue-shirted men from Stamford Bridge began a sad, painful walk towards the dressing room. A sea of misery.
A Bridge of Sighs.
As the match went into extra time, Anfield paid this seemingly indestructable team the ultimate compliment by booing them every time they touched the ball.
That showed just how concerned Liverpool fans were that the holy grail of the Champions League final might still be snatched from their grasp. Remember the huge banner unfurled on the Kop before the game did read: “We’re Scouse not English”. (Abridged)
That showed just how concerned Liverpool fans were that the holy grail of the Champions League final might still be snatched from their grasp. Remember the huge banner unfurled on the Kop before the game did read: “We’re Scouse not English”. (Abridged)
I'll add the backgound music "Santorini ( live at the Acropolis) "later since I cannot get access to Blogger in dorm:(
5/04/2007
After Chirac, a Question Mark on French Foreign Policy
By ELAINE SCIOLINO
Published: May 2, 2007
Source: The New York Times
PARIS, May 1 — The most dramatic change in France’s foreign policy in a new presidency may not be the arrival of either Nicolas Sarkozy or Ségolène Royal, but the departure of President Jacques Chirac.
Published: May 2, 2007
Source: The New York Times
PARIS, May 1 — The most dramatic change in France’s foreign policy in a new presidency may not be the arrival of either Nicolas Sarkozy or Ségolène Royal, but the departure of President Jacques Chirac.
For twelve years, Mr. Chirac has been a hands-on head of state who saw the world through two prisms: the cold war and France’s old colonial ties.
Both candidates have campaigned on platforms of swift change — inside France. Deeply aware of the French concern about immigration and globalization, both have hesitated to tell the French that they need not fear the outside world. That means that both would be expected to strongly promote France’s national interests when faced with hard compromise.
“The most important thing to keep in mind is that there is a broad consensus on foreign policy in France since de Gaulle — stronger than in the United States — and both Ségolène and Sarkozy are part of it,” said Justin Vaisse, a French historian. “On far-flung issues like the Middle East, Africa, multilateralism, proliferation, you find a lot of consensus. Both will be willing to oppose the United States to protect French interests.”
Indeed, on many issues, the two candidates agree. Both supported and have defended Mr. Chirac’s decision to oppose the American-led war in Iraq, although Mr. Sarkozy famously criticized his government for arrogance in the way that decision was made.
Both oppose military action against Iran. But they favor tougher sanctions against that country as well as against Sudan, pledge to make human rights a top priority, are skeptical of France’s conciliatory attitude toward Russia and China and are concerned about American plans for a missile shield deployment in Eastern Europe.
Mr. Sarkozy has much more experience on the global stage than Ms. Royal does. As interior minister, the third highest post in the French government after the president and prime minister, he was responsible for cross-border issues, including terrorism, immigration, drug trafficking, money laundering and organized crime networks.
The Sarkozy camp has attacked Ms. Royal for her lack of foreign policy gravitas and her repeated gaffes. France “doesn’t need someone who changes ideas as often as her skirts,” Defense Minister Michèle Alliot-Marie, a Sarkozy supporter, said at a rally on Sunday.
But when Mr. Sarkozy stumbles, he tends to be forgiven. When Ms. Royal got wrong the number of submarines in France’s navy, she was portrayed as a foreign policy neophyte; when Mr. Sarkozy did the same thing, his mistake was largely ignored.Similarly, Mr. Sarkozy’s apparent ignorance in a television interview in February that Al Qaeda was a Sunni movement was little noticed.
[Image: Royal's feisty performance vs. Sarkozy's calm attitude in the television interview]
Both candidates have campaigned on platforms of swift change — inside France. Deeply aware of the French concern about immigration and globalization, both have hesitated to tell the French that they need not fear the outside world. That means that both would be expected to strongly promote France’s national interests when faced with hard compromise.
“The most important thing to keep in mind is that there is a broad consensus on foreign policy in France since de Gaulle — stronger than in the United States — and both Ségolène and Sarkozy are part of it,” said Justin Vaisse, a French historian. “On far-flung issues like the Middle East, Africa, multilateralism, proliferation, you find a lot of consensus. Both will be willing to oppose the United States to protect French interests.”
Indeed, on many issues, the two candidates agree. Both supported and have defended Mr. Chirac’s decision to oppose the American-led war in Iraq, although Mr. Sarkozy famously criticized his government for arrogance in the way that decision was made.
Both oppose military action against Iran. But they favor tougher sanctions against that country as well as against Sudan, pledge to make human rights a top priority, are skeptical of France’s conciliatory attitude toward Russia and China and are concerned about American plans for a missile shield deployment in Eastern Europe.
Mr. Sarkozy has much more experience on the global stage than Ms. Royal does. As interior minister, the third highest post in the French government after the president and prime minister, he was responsible for cross-border issues, including terrorism, immigration, drug trafficking, money laundering and organized crime networks.
The Sarkozy camp has attacked Ms. Royal for her lack of foreign policy gravitas and her repeated gaffes. France “doesn’t need someone who changes ideas as often as her skirts,” Defense Minister Michèle Alliot-Marie, a Sarkozy supporter, said at a rally on Sunday.
But when Mr. Sarkozy stumbles, he tends to be forgiven. When Ms. Royal got wrong the number of submarines in France’s navy, she was portrayed as a foreign policy neophyte; when Mr. Sarkozy did the same thing, his mistake was largely ignored.Similarly, Mr. Sarkozy’s apparent ignorance in a television interview in February that Al Qaeda was a Sunni movement was little noticed.
[Image: Royal's feisty performance vs. Sarkozy's calm attitude in the television interview]
Good luck to Ms. Royal in 5.6 French Presidential Elections! I'll keep an eye on the final results in SJ Campus~~
Time 100 most influential people of the year
HU JINTAO
CON: The inevitable democratization that accompanies such rapid economic growth is beginning to undermine the control of Hu's party. Growing economic disparity has also stoked public discontent, especially in rural areas. And although the Internet has made absolute censorship more difficult, Hu's regime still maintains a tight control on information. ( ZT from Time.com)
AGE: 64
OCCUPATION: President of the People's Republic of China
Rank: 47
Average Rating: 62
Total Votes: 3,297
PRO: The chief of a vast, nuclear-armed economic powerhouse whose economy is growing at a blistering pace and is well on its way to becoming the primary global counterbalance to U.S. power.
CON: The inevitable democratization that accompanies such rapid economic growth is beginning to undermine the control of Hu's party. Growing economic disparity has also stoked public discontent, especially in rural areas. And although the Internet has made absolute censorship more difficult, Hu's regime still maintains a tight control on information. ( ZT from Time.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)